RSS

Tag Archives: Democrats

Those Saying Hillary Lied Are The Ones Lying Or They’re Profoundly Ignorant Of the Facts

Hillary4

A Hillary hater critic sent me a Daily Show Youtube clip in which the show’s host absolutely “destroys” Hillary for “lying” based on what FBI Director James Comey said in his presser excoriating Hillary only saving her the ultimate excoriation were he to recommend her indictment, which he didn’t,stating the evidence did not suggest that she did anything she could be indicted under the applicable law.

I have both “destroying” and “lying” in quotes because the truth is, for anyone who knows or understands the facts and law in this case, what Trevor has brilliantly done is to smear Hillary based on his genuinely not understanding the facts and law in the case which both actually support the opposite conclusion as to lying, namely, Hillary did not lie as Trevor claims, parroting a lie that is being peddled by mostly the right wing media but also equally ignorant or lying MSM reporters and pundits.

Here’s a breakdown for you to make my point:

In the clip, Trevor uses Hillary’s own words she has been saying and contrasts that with Comey’s own words contradicting them and thus leading Trevor and others reaching the same conclusion, namely, if what Hillary is saying is contradictory to what Comey is saying she must therefore be lying.

Not true.

Both Comey and Hillary are telling the truth.

Hillary says she did not send “any classified material to anyone on [her] email.” Comey says “110 emails in 52 email chains have been determined to contain classified material at the time they were sent.”

However, Hillary has also been saying she did not send or receive any emails that were “marked” classified, it is true as Comey says that there were classified emails sent or received at the relevant time, but it’s also true as Hillary says she did not receive or send classified emails because they were not so marked as Comey confirms!

Comey, however, took exception to this, namely, Hillary saying none of the emails were not marked as “classified” saying even though these emails were not so marked, a reasonable person and therefore Hillary should have known the content of the email was classified information.

Indeed, this is mainly the reason why Comey excoriated Hillary that what she did was “extremely careless” even though not to the level of gross negligence required for criminal prosecution.

At the same time, Comey also said something that was extremely damning and initially provided the evidence that Hillary lied when he said a “small portion” of these emails were found to bear markings, which obviously directly contradicts what Hillary and those of us who have followed this closely said to ourselves, “that’s bad; no way both can be true.”

However, thanks to the stupidity of Congressional Republicans hauling Comey to testify but really as a means to discredit this highly regarded and respected civil servant—thanks to that stupidity Comey provided new information that completely removes this as a contradiction and makes what Hillary said about it not a lie.

As it turns out, the “small portion” that Comey was talking about were 3 emails out of more than 30,000 Hillary received and sent that were marked classified.

However, Comey under questioning from a sharp Democrat admitted that the markings in those 3 emails were not in conformity with rules governing how classified communication should be marked and, more importantly, Comey admitted that a reasonable person could have reached the same conclusion as Hillary did that these emails were not classified!

In other words, Comey shreds to pieces the charge that Hillary lied about not receiving marked classified emails because paltry 3 found to be marked were incorrectly marked to make what she said true despite what Comey said to the contrary.

As icing to the cake, Comey also admitted in this moronically called hearing what would have otherwise received little notice, namely, the fact that the State Department said the day before that 2 of those 3 emails did not after contain classified information because the classified marking the bore—incorrect as it were, were in error to begin with!

Meaning, there’s only 1 email out of more than 30,000 that bears a classified marking but as noted above, that marking was incorrect therefore leaving intact and true what Hillary has been saying about not receiving or sending emails marked classified.

The clip next shows Hllary saying she “provided all [her] emails that could be possibly work related” to SOS after being asked to do so but Comey says in the clip “several thousand that were not among the group of 30,000 emails returned.”

From this, Trevor and others charge that Hillary is therefore lying about this; how could she say she turned in ALL her emails when Comey found “thousands more” that were not turned in?

The answer is simple and Comey actually provided it in his presser except those eager to depict Hillary as a liar have no time to hear what he said, don’t care or the lying narrative is good for business, which is exactly the case in this Trevor clip.

Truth is, Comey said himself he found no evidence that email withheld any emails and provided an explanation for the additional emails found could have simply the case of technical inability to capture all emails in the various systems Hillary used over the 4-year period.

In other words, Hillary did not lie about this because at the time she said it, she actually believed she had produced all emails that could be possibly official email.

Hillary is next shown to say, they “went through a thorough process to identify all work related emails” but Comey says “lawyers doing the sorting did not individually read the content of all of her emails.”

Again, both are true and Hillary is therefore not lying about this either because the process her lawyers utilized to make sure all work related were identified and produced was “thorough” but you can’t compare that with resources at FBI disposal which is obviously more thorough but doesn’t mean the process Hillary used wasn’t thorough as she says it was therefore no lie here.

Hillary says she “thought it would be easier to carry just one devise” but Comey says she “used numerous devices. Again, no lie here because Hillary is talking about why she initially set-up her private server and her using a single device was part of that rationale even though she obviously later used more than one device.

Hillary has been saying “there were no security breaches” but Comey says “it’s possible hostile actors had access to SOS personal email account.” Again, anyone who bothered to listen or read the transcript of what Comey said would know there’s a simple explanation for this that makes both what Hillary said and what Comey said to be true, which means she’s not lying on this either.

Recall the server Hillary was using is that of her husband, the former president of the United States and therefore you would have to expect this is not some jua kali system as everyone who hates Hillary would have you believe and she has repeatedly said what was, in fact, confirmed that the system had safeguards to ensure security and was NOT HACKED despite numerous attempts.

Indeed, Comey specifically said they found no evidence of hacking but added the superfluous her critics are trying to milk, namely, that “it’s possible” the system could have been breached and they just couldn’t find the evidence but that was an irresponsible statement because it puts Hillary in a position to prove a negative in order to reconcile what she said and what he said.

However, for purposes of whether Hillary “lied” about this, what Comey found and said is enough to reach the conclusion she did not.

Given this sound analysis, it should be clear to anyone watching this clip that it’s not Hillary who’s lying but those who are saying she’s lying are the ones lying question is why?

Only three possibilities: (1) They hate Hillary therefore to them facts don’t matter or (2) they’re just lazy to take time to learn and understand all the facts or (3) they’re simply parroting the right wing lies to up their own ratings, Trevor is guilty of one or two of these hint: he doesn’t hate Hillary.

Please note I have provided more info that’s in the clip because that’s what a good analyst does and now the reader knows nothing but the whole the truth.

As I have been saying, now get ready for our next president of this already great country Hillary Clinton because a majority of voters just won’t allow the bigoted clown to become our president, especially more so under this climate we urgently need a coming together not reversing to the ugly past where bigotry and discrimination reigned unabashedly.

Advertisements
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 8, 2016 in Law, Politics

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Why Hillary Clinton Will Not Be Indicted

Hillary2

There’s no doubt the US presidential election of 2016 is thus far the most fascinating and equally baffling election anyone alive has seen, judging from what the dinosaurs in political punditry are saying certainly nothing those of us headed there have seen.

The hijacking of the Republican Party by a reality television star and sometimes successful real estate developer known as Donald Trump is in by itself the very definition of strange politics where nothing makes sense, especially when the clown seems to essentially defy the laws of gravity.

On the Democratic side, the strange phenomena is a Socialist Bernie Sanders giving Hillary Clinton a run for her money, at least in the only 3 states where his socialism finds home among Democrats who support him.

The odds on favorite to win the Democratic Party nomination, however, is still Hillary who is also likely to win come November against anyone who emerges as the wounded Republican nominee, especially if the wounded nominee is either Donald Trump or Ted Cruz neither of whom have a chance against Hillary unless Trump flips and gives the middle finger to those who nominated him and abandons all the crazy and impossible promises he has and continues to make thus far in which case he might avoid losing in a landslide and minimizes losses down the ticket when Hillary emerges as the victor.

But Republicans’ first major obstacle to regaining the White House is Hillary that’s why their strategy has been and continues to be finding a way of derailing or stopping her from being nominated because they know they just can’t stop her once she’s nominated.

The irony is, they must also find a way to stop either Trump or Ted Cruz to stand a chance of winning the presidency, let alone other offices down the line.

When 4 Americans were killed in Libya back in 2012 including the US Ambassador there and it later emerged that the Obama administration had mischaracterized the nature of the attack and in particular, who was behind it, Republican operatives got on their knees, put their hands together and looking to heaven thanked God for the tragedy.

This was an opportunity, in their view, to get rid of Hillary or at least damage her enough to derail her match to the White House as president.

This is because Hillary having been Secretary of State at the time the attacks occurred and having essentially been the architect of the US policy that led to the toppling of Libya’s leader Muamar Gaddafi which in turn led to creating the environment under which the attacks took place, Republicans were determined to wrap the failed policy around Hillary and use the four tragic deaths as the noose to strangle and kill her politically.

That strategy was in full throttle and making significant progress as Hillary’s honesty and trustworthy numbers steadily got worse until God smiled on her as Representative Kevin MacCarthy shocked everyone by publicly admitting what Democrats knew but could not prove and that’s, the Benghazi Committee—one of several Republicans had convened since the attack—was put together simply to hurt Hillary politically.

While this admission cost MaCarthy ascendancy to the Speakership and possibly earned him a spot in the annals of US history albeit for the wrong reasons, the admission uncurled the noose around Hillary’s neck breathing a new life to her political life from which she continues to benefit as she resumes her position as the presumptive nominee for Democrats and ultimately capturing the big trophy and that’s keys to the White House.

Hillary, however, is not in the clear as she must first get to the nomination and actually get nominated and every Republican and foe of hers who prays, prays and hopes that doesn’t happen which can only be the case if she’s indicted over the use of her private server to conduct official business when she was Secretary of State.

Those who have never prayed, are praying for the first time that she’s indicted but in the minds of her enemies, she’s already indicted, convicted and sent to jail even though none of that will happen in reality.

Most objective lawyers who have analyzed Hillary’s use of a private server, however, have come to the conclusion that Hillary cannot be indicted, based on what’s known about the facts and it’s unlikely any facts will emerge to change the outcome.

Providing a detailed analysis of the legal issues leading to this conclusion is beyond this article’s scope but if interested, No, Hillary Clinton Did Not Commit A Crime is a good analysis as to why.

Which brings me to this conclusion for reasons separate and apart from the analysis Dan Abrams provides in the article linked above that yours truly and most objective legal analysts agree with and that is, Hillary can also not be indicted for political reasons.

Let’s assume for the sake of argument that the FBI director recommends that Hillary should be indicted. Under US law, the Attorney General (AG) has the final say whether or not to bring charges of this kind against anyone.

On the other hand, even though technically under the AG, the FBI Director is an independent office so its director can conceivably make decisions that are antithetical to his boss (the AG) or even opposed by the President, who is their boss—and nothing will happen to him.

In short, the AG can’t be fired for simply taking some action that’s inconsistent with the president’s wishes or interests because the protection against arbitrary firing is in his appointment and confirmation his termination can only be for cause and recommending the prosecution of Hillary is not cause.

The question then becomes, what would happen were the FBI Director to recommend that Hillary be indicted?

There are three options: One, the AG shelves the recommendation where it collects dust for several months going into the first months of Hillary’s administration in which case what to do with it would be obvious (hint: nothing). Two, the AG can empanel a jury and have Hillary indicted. Three, she can receive the recommendation and declare to the world “after carefully reviewing the recommendation, I have concluded there’s no sufficient legal basis to seek an indictment.”

In the informed opinion of this writer, even though the first option is extremely attractive and less problematic for the AG or president for that matter, the third option would be the case even if there’s evidence gathered to indict a hapless and average Joe or Jane Doe.

This is because in American jurisprudence, one has traditionally been deemed to be innocent until proven guilty but this notion is increasingly being turned on its head to the point it’s now the case one is guilty until proven innocent, especially in politically charged cases.

Thus, in the event Hillary is indicted, that would be the equivalent of having her declared she’s guilty as charged long before even a trial takes place to put the government to task in proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt, which no one serious who knows anything about criminal law other than hapless partisans thinks they can.

Indicting Hillary will therefore be grossly unfair and irreparably so, especially given the fact as noted above, it’s more likely than not that she will ultimately be acquitted of all charges were she to be charged and therefore in hindsight be a victim of an overambitious prosecution that serves nobody any good other than those baying for her political blood and throwing the Democratic Party into a spin that could only be worse and fatalistic than the mess Republicans find themselves.

That’s a prospect no president would want for his or her party as a legacy and the AG knows that so she would do the right thing without the President even as suggesting that she does so and follow either of the two options above and certainly not having Hillary indicted.

It’s exactly what a Republican president would want done under identical circumstances.
In other words, it’s as old-fashioned politics as it can be that’s not to say it would be the case were the circumstances different, say, an open and shut case of criminal conduct.

That’s not the case here therefore expect Hillary to continue marching to White House this time and the next and first female person to hold that powerful office.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 11, 2016 in Law, Politics

 

Tags: , , , ,

President Obama Loses Big In First Debate

I did not watch the debates but as soon as they were over, a die-hard Obama supporter frantically tried to reach me via phone but I was not available and can now see several missed calls from him. His text says it all, “Obama just blew his chance to put away Romney. He bombed!”

Alarmed, I quickly started perusing the best news outlets which can give you the most favorable news about Obama, MSNBC, Huffington Post, etc and they are all saying the same thing: Romney won and won big.

The danger of this is this, Romney is from tomorrow going to carry the banner “the Come Back Kid” much as Clinton did in 1992, except, and this is the irony, Clinton actually lost a primary (I think New Hampshire) but somehow went on to declare himself the “Come Back Kid” and with that attitude, he sent George Bush Senior to early retirement.

Let’s home the same thing doesn’t happen with Romney.

The one sure reason why it may, is because Americans have the shortest memory of all people I know.

Forget about the polls from yesterday; when the news splash say Romney floored Obama as they no doubt will, there will be a stampede of voters thronging to his side and suddenly Obama becomes hapless.

The only thing that’s going to save Obama from this point on is to arouse even more of his base.

The 47% Romney dismissed as irrelevant in his campaign strategy and hope they show up in large numbers to negate gains Romney is likely to enjoy with the momentum coming from this obvious victory many did not think he would pull off.

A prayer wouldn’t hut; Romney surely will pray as well, but it appears his prayer has already been answered.

It’s now game on and only each man’s destiny will prevail according to God’s will.

In other words, it’s all now in God’s hand and given He doesn’t do favors, His will simply shall come to pass but the two have to do what they humanly can for that’s really what life is all about; at least among believers.

Say a prayer but do your best.

Obama did not do his best.

Was this God’s will?

Maybe.

Why?

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on October 4, 2012 in Politics

 

Tags: , ,